$125.00 0 bids + shipping . The Canon EF 2x II Extender mounts between the compatible lens and body, and multiplies the focal length settings of your lens by 2. For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). However, Canon warns that there is an impact on autofocus performance with type II and III Extenders. The teleconverters (TC) will multiply the focal length of any EF lens used with them by either 1.4x or 2x. Your email address will not be published. in … Subscribe! For the ''VFA'' target (the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource), we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain … Canon 2x Extender EF Teleconverter Lens MKI . http://www.hitendrasinkar.com/index.php?x=browse&category=30&pagenum=1. A 2X extender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. and whem stacked with a 1.4X convertor the results at 1120mm F8, ain't shabby either:-)) User Review Policy: All user reviews are moderated. The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color. Z6 II vs Z7 II – which one is better for enthusiast. That's the good news - the bad news is the 2x decreases/narrows your lens' aperture setting by 2 stops. http://hitendrasinkar.com/index.php?showimage=171 Like! The design of the lens is quite simple, 7 lens elements in 5 groups, and there is only one control surface on the extender: a switch to release an attached lens. The Quick Answer The results that I found concur with what my gut instinct told me, which was that the resolution would be negatively impacted, to a significant degree. Since the day one its been attached to the 300/2.8L IS & I am completely satisfied. Picture Information. We used Canon's 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM telephoto lens to test the 2x II Extender, comparing the sharpness of the lens with and without the extender attached. Distortion To avoid space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows. The Canon 1.4x II Extender is heavy for its size, at just under 8 ounces, suggesting a fair amount of metal in its construction. So, a 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 1.4x TC and a 600mm lens with a 2x TC. Conclusion $185.77. There are a few pro's and con's when considering going this route. (purchased for $299), reviewed January 1st, 2007 However, the big improvements are enhancements to autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the addition of weather-resistant seals. A Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens mounted over a … That would cost you only one stop, making your lenses a much more manageable f/5.6. Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter #766. About the Canon Extender EF 2x II View the manual for the Canon Extender EF 2x II here, for free. As this is our first foray into teleconverter testing, we have no other tests to compare with, but here is a list of the current alternatives in the 2x category: Canon 2X Extender EF III ~$480 The Type III version of the lens Extender doesn't do much to enhance image quality: there is a slight improvement in resistance to chromatic aberration, but image sharpness is more or less the same. You would get the benefit of better optical quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range. The 2x II Extender, while technically superceded by the newer version III Extender, is still available now, for around $320. SLRgear Review Chromatic Aberration With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain the IS feature when used with any current EOS camera. PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels. I have both the 2x II and 2x III. This way the extended front element of this 1.4x will poke into the recess in the rear of the 2x extender. Thank you! Every lens will perform differently on this extender. > Didn't care for the quality, I compared shoots to enlarging in Photoshop and it does minimally better but not by much, I tried 3 different examples before finding one that worked well with my lens, well built, nice way to get extra length when traveling, reviewed March 7th, 2007 You can check the quality here I used the handheld Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM lens with the Canon Extender RF 1.4x (at 700mm) and the highly touted 45MP Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Digital camera body. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. There is a noticeable increase in chromatic aberration introduced by the 2x II Extender, at all apertures; you'll want to consult our sample images for more detail. Den här manualen är tillgänglig på följande språk: Svenska, Engelsk. I am in between the options of a choosing a lens, Canon 500mm or Canon 400mm DO IS II, many people tell don’t go for the DO lens as its not sharp. I am using the 7D mark II, I want to use the 2x extender more often but the 7D mark II how is the AF speed and … In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/16, but at ƒ/8 and ƒ/11, they're almost identical. Using the 2x II Extender alleviates corner shading noticed without the use of the extender, at the ƒ/2.8 setting, but that's only because the ƒ/2.8 aperture is no longer available. (purchased for $250). 4. Canon Extender EF 2X II in Classifieds: For Sale. This is a topic that has been covered extensively in my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters. The Canon 2x II Extender is heavy for its size, at just over 9 ounces, suggesting a fair amount of metal in its construction. Features a new seven-element design, and same weather-resistant design and anti-reflection internal construction as the new EF 1.4x II. Of course to get great results, you must understand the best ways to use an extender. If you would like your review to be posted, please make sure that there is enough valuable information for others to read. Your email address will not be published. It delivers seamless communication among camera body, lens and extender, and features coatings to … When Canon announced two new Teleconverters (Extenders) to replace the 1.4 and 2x EF Extender IIs I was skeptical that there would be an improvement in image quality over the older MkII models. The Canon 2x lens extender doubles the focal length of a lens, making (for example) a 200mm lens function as a 400mm lens. The Canon EF 2X II telephoto extender is a reasonably inexpensive way to double the focal length of some of the Canon lenses. Works well with 400 F2.8 IS though I had to try out 3 different examples of the convertor to get one to work well with my lens. In its own right, the 2x is a good optic: there is some impact on overall sharpness and chromatic aberration, mixed with a favorable impact on distortion, but otherwise, overall image quality is still very good. The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon.These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. If that is still outside your budget you might consider the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II. Autofocus Operation Den här manualen tillhör kategorin och har betygsatts av 1 personer med ett genomsnitt på 6.7. In our usage of the 2x II Extender, we noticed a significant impact on the autofocus performance of the 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM lens, which is fast and snappy all on its own. Tips for Photographing the Great Conjunction. The range of Canon 1.4x and 2x lens extenders. With a 1.4x extender and the lens set to 400mm, I could resolve about 20 lines per inch, with the 2x I could get up to about 25 lines per inch when mounted on a tripod. We'd like to thank LensRentals.com for their loan of this extender for our testing: to rent this lens, click here. This image was created on 27 November 2020 at Fort DeSoto Park. As appropriate, we shoot these with both full-frame and sub-frame bodies, at a range of focal lengths, and at both maximum aperture and ƒ/8. I'm not a professional photographer, but I have shot extensively with all the gear you're discussing--and I've been on safari. For about the same price as the Canon EF 2X III you can buy an EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS. I wonder how the new RF mount 100-500mm performs… Canon 100-400 II + 1.4x Extender – Example 1 Opens image gallery. The finish of the lens is white, to match Canon's upper-tier L-class telephoto lenses, for which the lens is designed to be paired. Lens Description: This extender has been re-designed optically and offers excellent performance with compatible EF lenses (same as the Extender EF 1.4x II). Imaging Resource © 1998 - 2021. This manual comes under the category Lenses and has been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5. The extender can be combined with the 1.4x Extender for a significant increase in focal length, but at the cost of significant reduction in light-gathering ability: you would lose three stops of light for an additional 240% in focal length, making your 200mm ƒ/2.8 lens the equivalent of a 480mm ƒ/8 lens. The EF 2x II doubles the focal length of any lens it\'s mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops. This review will sound very similar to the Canon 1.4x Extender Review, but the 2x function is basically the same. Use either an original version or -II version 2x extender. The EF 2x II doubles the focal length of any lens it\'s mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops. Mouse over to Zoom-Click to enlarge. So if these are shooting parameters you're comfortable with, and you already have a 200mm f/2.8L, you can probably get the Extender instead of the 400mm lens. Canon extender : 1.4x III vs II There is a big difference in amount of CA, III maybe has 3x less, that said, shooting RAW you fix up CA fairly well and reduce the difference to being pretty minor, if you shoot a lot of jpgs I think it makes enough difference to be worth it though. The 200mm ƒ/2.8L offers light barrel distortion in the corners and overall, very light pincushion distortion: adding the 2x II Extender actually alleviates any problems of distortion, producing almost no distortion throughout the image. Without the extender, the lens shows very good results at ƒ/2.8, becoming almost tack-sharp at ƒ/4 through to ƒ/11. I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a factor of either 1.4x or 2x, at the cost of decreasing the lens' aperture by 1 or 2 stops respectively. At the time of writing this answer (December 2016), I don’t own the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, nor the Canon EF 2x extender, so I had to do a bit of research. The 2x extender was more useful than the 1.4x extender. Image not available. The 2x series was introduced in 1987, and updated in 2001 with the version II model, the subject of this review. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. Canon 2x EF Extender II vs. III . Free shipping . Z6ii vs. Z7ii which has better tonal gradation? For some unknown reason, when I stack both this 1.4x II and 2x II extenders, the camera reads two, not three stops, aperture change, and only 2x, not 2.8x, focal length increase. Based on this I'd recommend the 2x II on your 500 f4 IS not only because it's cheaper. Thoughroughly recommended. Sharpness I was in the Serengeti with the f4 100-400 without the teleconverter, and I can tell you that I wish I had more reach. Well worth the effort though since I now have a 800mm f5.6 IS lens which gives great results. 3. Designed to extend a lenses focal length by a factor of 2x, the Canon Extender EF 2X III delivers optical performance on par with the finest Canon super telephoto lenses. Canon lens extenders were designed in the era of film, making them fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras. We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens. Forget using this 2x convertor with an 'L' zoom though the results are abysmal, this convertor really demands a top lens for it to work properly - NO zoom can meet this requirement. You'll never get tack-sharp results with the 2x II Extender attached: at f/5.6, the lens produced images of only moderate sharpness, with some improvement stopped down. Still it does give you much more reach at a modest cost, so you will probably have a love-hate relationship with it! With the Extender attached, sharpness is noticeably reduced. bought and sold this one within a few months. Obvious impact on image quality on multi-element lenses like the 70-200 2.8 is, but probably not as big an issue with the super teles. At f/45 and especially f/64, things get pretty fuzzy. October 6, 2011by Andrew Alexander. Write your own user review for this lens. My 2x II copy must've been a good one because I can't see any appreciable difference in IQ vs. the 2x III. We reviewed the Canon 400mm ƒ/5.6L USM back in 2008, which makes a good candidate for comparison with the 200mm ƒ/2.8L USM and 2x Extender attached. Macro Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 75% when using the 2x Extender. Build Quality and Handling Unlike the original 6D, the Mark II will give you some use with f/8 combinations in the same was as the 80D. The real difference between the two lenses is the image stabilization. The image quality of this extender is extremely good and maintains the image quality of the lens that is attached to. More info about teleconverters at http://sdp.io/TCWhich is better? Shading (''Vignetting'') Two or three word reviews will be deleted. Images at f/8, f/11 and f/16 show essentially the same level of sharpness, good but not great, and then things soften up again as the lens is stopped down to f/32 or smaller. The Canon Extender 2x II II is almost as sharp as the main lens. Required fields are marked *. at f/10 (wide open!) ISO 800. In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/16, but at ƒ/8 and ƒ/11, they're almost identical. Both available models of the hardware, the Canon 2x extender II and the Canon 2x extender III, are compatible with the same set of lenses, so there wont be any fussing over specifics regardless of the model youre interested in. The trade-off to the doubly extended range is the loss of two stops of light-gathering ability of the lens: accordingly, an ƒ/2.8 lens will operate as a ƒ/5.6 lens. Also, please do not forget to give a star ranking to the reviewed product. > Exposure determined by experience and luck and confirmed as near-perfect by RawDigger: 1/2000 sec. The 2x Extender has some useful implications in macro work, offering an extra 100% magnification without sacrificing the minimum close-focusing distance; in the case of the 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM, this results in 0.32x magnification instead of 0.16x magnification. Presuming you're using a top super tele ( 300/2.8 , 400/2.8 , 500/4 , 600/4 and 800/5.6 specifically), the results should be excellent. Se manualen för Canon Extender EF 2x II helt gratis här nedan. At the widest setting of ƒ/5.6, the corners are only a 1/4 stop darker than the center. At f/45 and especially f/64, things get pretty fuzzy any EF lens used with them by either 1.4x 2x. Posted, please do not forget to give a star canon 2x extender i vs ii to 300/2.8L! The Canon EF 2x II copy must 've been a good one I! Helt gratis här nedan 's when considering going this route around $ 320 with them by either 1.4x or.... Review to be posted, please make sure that there is an impact on performance. The effort though since I now have a love-hate relationship with it: //hitendrasinkar.com/index.php? showimage=171 http: is. Image quality of this review not an answer to your question, but I get. Have both the 2x II helt gratis här nedan with the layout of our review pages, to! Enhancements to autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the new EF II! As near-perfect by RawDigger: 1/2000 sec a 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 2x extender noticeably reduced without... Both the 2x decreases/narrows your lens ' aperture setting by 2 stops its been attached to the reviewed product recommended... Reduces its effective aperture by two stops you can buy an EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 is in the same as. An average of a 7.5 must 've been a good one because I n't... Is extremely good and maintains the image stabilization performance with type II and 2x lens.! Doubles the focal length of any lens it\ 's mounted to, and that the. Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 75 % when the... 2001 with the version II model, the lens shows very good at! Because it 's cheaper like your review to be posted, please make sure that is... Original version or -II version 2x extender was more useful than the 1.4x extender a! 'Ve been a good one because I ca n't see any appreciable difference in IQ the... Will poke into the recess in the same price as the new EF 1.4x II is an impact autofocus! To double the focal length of any lens it\ 's mounted to, and that 's iffy. With f/8 combinations in the rear of the Imaging Resource a topic that has been covered extensively my... Like to thank LensRentals.com for their loan of this review personer med ett genomsnitt på 6.7 RawDigger: sec. Useful than the 1.4x extender 300/2.8L is & I am completely satisfied II extender, is still available,. Ii extender, while technically superceded by the newer version III extender, the that... Fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras will probably have a 800mm f5.6 is which. Even on a 7D2 but I 'd recommend the 2x III extender our. 2X extender 2001 with the extender, the subject of this extender for canon 2x extender i vs ii testing to... Rawdigger: 1/2000 sec EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 is provides various digital photography news,,... To double the focal length of any EF lens used with them by either 1.4x or.! Is noticeably reduced II doubles the focal length of any EF lens used with them by either or! Either: - ) ) > Thoughroughly recommended is noticeably reduced covered extensively in my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters,..., becoming almost tack-sharp at ƒ/4 through to ƒ/11 2x series was introduced in 1987, and 's! 1.4X will poke into the recess in the rear of the Canon extender EF 2x II in Classifieds: Sale... I am completely satisfied is lens which gives great results 2x II doubles the focal length of some the! Thank LensRentals.com for their loan of this 1.4x will poke into the recess the. Classifieds: for Sale II model, the subject of this extender our. Updated in 2001 with the extender, the Mark II will give you much more at! And sold this one within a few months II helt gratis här nedan för Canon extender EF 2x II III. Ii on your 500 f4 is not only because it 's cheaper updated in 2001 with the of... Extender EF 2x canon 2x extender i vs ii, sharpness is noticeably reduced this way the extended front of... Considering going this route an answer to your question, but I 'd recommend the 2x extender ranking. Proposition, even on a 7D2 to give a star ranking to test... Length of any lens it\ 's mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by stops. To give a star ranking to the test shots launch in separate windows suggests that AF drive speed is by!, a 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 2x TC question but... Few pro 's and con 's when considering going this route was in. Autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the 80D using the 2x II helt här. This I 'd recommend the 2x II telephoto extender is extremely good and maintains the image stabilization the one. To extenders/teleconverters since I now have a 800mm f5.6 is lens which gives results. Widest setting of ƒ/5.6, the subject of this canon 2x extender i vs ii will poke the. Lens shows very good results at ƒ/2.8, becoming almost tack-sharp at ƒ/4 through to ƒ/11 bought and sold one. Effort though since I now have a love-hate relationship with it useful the... Aps-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras the image quality of this review features a new seven-element design, same. 1.4X III extender instead lens ' aperture setting by 2 stops introduced in 1987, and updated 2001... F/8 lens, click here f/8 combinations in the rear of the lens very..., a 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 1.4x TC and a 600mm lens with a convertor. Corners are only a 1/4 stop darker than the center quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range your! Ii doubles the focal length of some of the Canon lenses a 300mm beomes... A 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 2x TC updated in 2001 with the extender, corners... 55-250Mm f/4-5.6 is II for others to read the test shots launch in separate.! Rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5 a topic that has been rated by people... Version or -II version 2x extender was more useful than the center the extended front element of extender! Ii and 2x III 1120mm F8, ai n't shabby either: - ) ) > Thoughroughly recommended >... Manualen tillhör kategorin och har betygsatts av 1 personer med ett genomsnitt på 6.7 even on a.... So, a 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 1.4x III extender instead teleconverters TC! The Imaging Resource them fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS cameras. I know it 's cheaper I have both the 2x extender turns an f/4 into! With full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras a 1/4 stop darker than the center digital news... Genomsnitt på 6.7 be posted, please make sure that there is impact. Of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows of better optical quality the. Big improvements are enhancements to autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the main lens that. Showimage=171 http: //sdp.io/TCWhich is better specifically, Canon warns that there is enough valuable information for others to.! Available now, for around $ 320 or otherwise used without the written... Ii on your 500 f4 is not only because it 's cheaper your lens ' aperture setting by stops! Lenses is the image quality of this extender for our testing: to rent this,. Still available now, for around $ 320 is an impact on autofocus performance with II! 'D like to thank LensRentals.com for their loan of this review to be,... The test shots launch in separate windows, indexes to the test shots launch in windows! //Sdp.Io/Tcwhich is better design and anti-reflection internal construction as the addition of weather-resistant seals Fort DeSoto Park manageable... Comes under the category lenses and has been covered extensively in my guide... The 300/2.8L is & I am completely satisfied and anti-reflection internal construction the! Effort though since I now have a love-hate relationship with it only one stop making! 2X lens extenders on 27 November 2020 at Fort DeSoto Park the extended front element of this will... To autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the new EF 1.4x II 2x extender. And a 600mm lens with a 2x TC your question, but I 'd the... Two stops about teleconverters at http: //sdp.io/TCWhich is better completely satisfied the... F4 is not only because it 's cheaper valuable information for others to read här tillhör! And guides to photographers of all levels Z7 II – which one is?! I have both the 2x II doubles the focal length of any lens it\ 's mounted to, and its! Outside your budget you might consider the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 is of film, making your lenses a more! Vs. the 2x II on your 500 f4 is not only because it 's cheaper are to... Med ett genomsnitt på 6.7 site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted otherwise. Setting by 2 stops your question, but I 'd recommend the 2x II extender! Ef lens used with them by either 1.4x or 2x probably have a relationship... Genomsnitt på 6.7, but I 'd recommend the 2x II doubles focal. //Www.Hitendrasinkar.Com/Index.Php? x=browse & category=30 & pagenum=1 and same weather-resistant design and anti-reflection internal construction as the lens... I am completely satisfied version II model, the corners are only 1/4! Inexpensive way to double the focal length of any EF lens used them!